Provided by BBVA The Internet is the decisive technology of the Information Age, and with the explosion of wireless communication in the early twenty-first century, we can say that humankind is now almost entirely connected, albeit with great levels of inequality in bandwidth, efficiency, and price. People, companies, and institutions feel the depth of this technological change, but the speed and scope of the transformation has triggered all manner of utopian and dystopian perceptions that, when examined closely through methodologically rigorous empirical research, turn out not to be accurate. For instance, media often report that intense use of the Internet increases the risk of isolation, alienation, and withdrawal from society, but available evidence shows that the Internet neither isolates people nor reduces their sociability; it actually increases sociability, civic engagement, and the intensity of family and friendship relationships, in all cultures.
These practices are tremendously important to know how humans act and interact with each other. Society does not exist independently without individual.
The individual lives and acts within society but society is nothing, in spite of the combination of individuals for cooperative effort. Human life and society almost go together.
Man is biologically and psychologically equipped to live in groups, in society. Society has become an essential condition for human life to arise and to continue.
The relationship between individual and society is ultimately one of the profound of all the problems of social philosophy. It is more philosophical rather than sociological because it involves the question of values. Man depends on society. It is in the society that an individual is surrounded and encompassed by culture, as a societal force.
It is in the society again that he has to conform to the norms, occupy statuses and become members of groups.
The question of the relationship between the individual and the society is the starting point of many discussions. It is closely connected with the question of the relationship of man and society. The re- lation between the two depends upon one fact that the individual and the society are mutually de- pendent, one grows with the help of the other.
The aim of this paper is to show the questions: Society, Social Life, Individual 1.
Introduction Man is a social animal. He has a natural urge to live an associated life with others. Man needs society for his existence or survival.
The human child depends on his parents and others for its survival and growth.
The inherent capacities of the child can develop only in society. The ultimate goal of society is to promote good and happy life for its individuals. It creates conditions and opportunities for the all round development of individual personality.
Society ensures harmony and cooperation among individuals in spite of their occasional conflicts and tensions. If society helps the individuals in numerous ways, great men also contribute to society by their wisdom and experience. Thus, society and individuals are bound by an intimate and harmonious bond and the conflicts between the two are apparent and momentary.
In a well-ordered society, there would be lasting harmony between the two. Society liberates and limits the activities of men and it is a necessary condition of every human being and need to fulfillment of life.
Society is a system of usages and procedures of authority and mutual aid many divisions of controls of human behavior and of liberties. This changing system, we call society and it is always changing . Society not confined to man . It should be clear that society is not limited to human beings.
There are many degrees of animal societies, likely the ants, the bee, the hornet, are known to most school children. It has been contended that wherever there is life there is society, because life means heredity and, so far as we know, can arise only out of and in the presence of other life.
All higher animals at least have a very definite society, arising out of the requirements their nature and the conditions involved in the perpetuation of their species . In society each member seeks something and gives something.
A society can also consist of likeminded people governed by their own norms and values within a dominant, large society moreover; a society may be illustrated as an economic, social or industrial infrastructure, made up of a varied collection of individuals.
Society is universal and pervasive and has no defined boundary or assignable limits. A society is a collection of individuals united by certain relations or modes of behavior which mark them off from others who do not enter into those relations or who differ from them in behavior.
In this way we can conclude that, society is the whole complex of social behavior and the network of social relationship .He quotes the anthropologist Edward B. Tylor as defining culture as, “that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society” ().
Certain products of culture are governments, languages, buildings and man made things. It is a powerful tool for the survival of mankind.
Cultural patterns of ancient people are reflected in their artifacts and are studied by archaeologists to understand their way of culture and society are different in a perspective view, culture can.
Marx’s analysis of the division of labor is remarkably similar to Rousseau’s.4 Both argued that the desire for private property led to the division of labor, and this in turn gave rise to the existence of separate social classes based on economic differences.
Culture is the characteristic of group of people defined by everything such as language, religion, lifestyle etc. Different people in different societies have different culture but they also have some similarities.
To view their interpretations as less perfect that ours is another. 6. You know that you are different from others in your culture. Other cultures are as diverse. The diversity within cultures probably exceeds the differences between cultures.
So just knowing one person’s cultural identity. man’s being’; that ‘man, who in the visible world is the only ontic subject of culture, is also its only object and its end’ and ‘that one cannot think of cul-ture without human subjectivity and without human causation; that, in the field of culture, man is always the first .