Ability to implement interventions and move from theory to practice Capacity to accurately reflect on progress Interpersonal skills Ability to work effectively with professional colleagues Ability to apply professional and ethical standards in practice Of all of these competencies, it has been found, however, that supervisees who become effective counselors are not necessarily those who can use any specific techniques Wampold,but rather those who show tolerance, empathy, social intelligence, a sense of well-being and self-esteem Eriksen and McAuliffe, Therefore, as a supervisor, you may want to focus on helping your supervisees to develop these personal characteristics. Excelling in a specific technique is more important for becoming an effective counselor than having characteristics of social intelligence, empathy, tolerance, and sense of well-being. It's a simple, but useful tool for helping determine where a counselor is at in her development:
Schedule a Writing Appointment Annotated: This summary or evaluation is usually only a few sentences in length but can be longer depending on the assignment.
The Purdue Writing Lab Purdue University students, faculty, and staff at our West Lafayette, IN campus may access this area for information on the award-winning Purdue Writing Lab. This area includes Writing Lab hours, services, and contact information. A book review is a descriptive and critical/evaluative account of a book. It provides a summary of the content, assesses the value of the book, and recommends it (or not) to other potential readers. A book report is an objective summary of the main ideas and arguments that the book's author has presented. The purpose of the report is to give enough information to help decide whether the book. The lack of timely supervisory feedback is the cause of many ethical complaints (Cole, ). What is meant by "timely" feedback? To have the most compelling impact, feedback should take place as close to the event to be discussed as possible.
Types of Annotated Bibliographies There are two primary types of annotated bibliographies: It paraphrases the main argument s or finding s in one or more specific sources.
In addition, some professors require that you discuss how you used the sources in developing your paper.
When doing this, it is important to provide concise yet thoughtful comments that give the reader a quick but useful insight into the sources that were used in the paper.
In an evaluative annotated bibliography, AVOID giving harsh personal opinions that are unsupported by examples or additional comments. It is fine to make a personal evaluation or opinion, but be sure to state it in a constructive manner and provide support for your opinion.
Ernest Hemingway and the pursuit of heroism. This book was stupid and uninteresting. This book was boring and a complete waste of time. There was an index and a short bibliography, but no notes. The biographical part was clear and easy to read, but it sounded too much like a summary.
The above sample was reprinted from Annotated Bibliographies: Most are single-spaced and provide the bibliographic details first, followed by the summary or evaluation of the source.
The summary section may be indented, or you may include two spaces between each individual entry, just as in a regular bibliography. This article provides a concise but useful look at the soaring popularity of Asian horror films released in the United States within the past few years.
The focus of the article is upon American re-makes of Asian horror films rather than the original versions. The implication is that the re-makes do best when they retain as much of the vision of the original film as possible. A discussion of the development of cognition and language.
The American School Board Journal, 85, Teachers are challenged to maximize cognitive and language growth in students. The article reviewed current research in language acquisition and cognitive development and suggested that the research be applied to the education of young children in these two important areas.
The Monsters and the Critics.Introduction. This handout will give suggestions of how to write annotated bibliographies.
Individual instructors may give instructions which vary from these examples. Guidelines for Preparing an Annotated Bibliography What is an Evaluative Annotation?
Evaluative annotations (also known as "critical" annotations) summarize the essential ideas in a document and provide judgments—negative, positive, or both—about their quality.
What this handout is about. This handout will explain why annotated bibliographies are useful for researchers, provide an explanation of what constitutes an annotation, describe various types of annotations and styles for writing them, and offer multiple examples of annotated bibliographies in the MLA, APA, and CBE/CSE styles of citation.
An annotated bibliography is a list of sources with accompanying information that describes, explains and/or evaluates each entry..
Contents of this guide: Center column: Steps for writing an annotated bibliography; Uses for annotated bibliographies; Types of annotations; Elements of annotations. Guides for Citing Sources. American Psychological Association (APA) citation style from the Purdue OWL; Modern Language Association (MLA) citation style from the Purdue OWL; Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) online.
A book review is a descriptive and critical/evaluative account of a book. It provides a summary of the content, assesses the value of the book, and recommends it (or not) to other potential readers.
A book report is an objective summary of the main ideas and arguments that the book's author has presented. The purpose of the report is to give enough information to help decide whether the book.